Why doesn’t God answer all of our prayers?
When it comes to prayer, people have been all over the map when trying to explain why some prayers are answered and some are not. There is probably not a person who has prayed more than once who cannot say that they didn’t get everything they asked for when they prayed. Why is that?
Well, the first answer is that not everyone who prays has put their trust in the God of the Bible as revealed in Jesus Christ. And, a complete reading of the Bible makes it clear that God listens to those who have placed their trust in Him. The same cannot be said of those who have not done so. Now, that doesn’t mean that God doesn’t answer prayer for “pre-Christians.” But what promises there are are only made to Christians in the New Testament.
Another reason that the New Testament itself gives is that sometimes our motives are less than proper. At one point we are told that we “ask amiss,” that we might have things only for our own selves. As any parent knows, indulging every whim of someone is a way to destroy their lives, not build them up – and God loves each of us too much to spoil us.
But we all know that there are still many prayers that are selfless and prayed by devout Christians that go unanswered. Why is that? Well, maybe one reason is that to do so would undermine God’s best will for not only us, but for all humanity. What I mean is this: If God answered every prayer clearly and promptly whenever a Christian asked, then we would have to ask ourselves if we are serving God for the rewards or for the joy of knowing him. God seems to think that having a close personal relationship with you and me is worth more than anything else – even the life of His Son. If God was willing to give the life of His own Son for us, why would we expect that he would undermine the relationship that He has enabled through that sacrifice by satisfying every whim of creatures who, even at their best, take each other and him for granted. The fact is that answers to prayer are very hard to prove. For every study that seems to suggest that answers can be quantified, there are dozens of others that show the exact opposite. And perhaps that is for the best. I want my children to love me for who I am, not what I give them. I suspect God feels the same way.
Shalom!
Pastor Ken
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Global Warming?
Our church has just gone on line with our new Solar Electric Generating system, and the reactions have been interesting. I hate to admit it, but I have had a couple of Pastors who have made comments about the “conspiracy” to convince us of supposed “non-existent” global warming, and asking if that was why we were doing this. So let me address this whole question of global warming.
First, let me say that I completely understand those who have doubts about the subject. I am old enough to remember when we were being told in the 1970s that we were in the middle of a “global cooling” that threatened to bring on another Ice Age. And, the question of global warming has been used as a political tool by both parties in our country, as well as being a sort of “orthodoxy” that many feel they can disagree with only at their peril. None of this affects whether or not global warming is a reality, but it certainly makes it hard for those not in the scientific community to know. So what are we to do? Is there a “Christian” response to all of this? I believe there is.
I believe that our response to this possible crisis can be informed by two scriptural principles. The first is that, in Genesis chapters 1-3 we are told that God has made humanity “stewards” of this creation. And, as the Bible says, Stewards are to be “found faithful” above all else (1 Corinthians 4:2). In other words, when someone is entrusted with something that belongs to someone else, they have a responsibility to do their very best to make sure that it stays in good shape. And, whether you believe in global warming or not, no one can deny that we have done a pretty poor job of keeping our environment clean. This world is not ours! It is God’s. And we are responsible to Him for how we use and treat it. So, the first reason I am so firmly committed to taking good care of this creation is because I am a steward appointed by God to do so, at least the part I have any control over.
The second principle comes from the teaching of Jesus that it is not even what we do that determines our responsibility, but our state of mind. You may remember that Jesus said that even looking at someone with lust is the first step to adultery and just hating someone is the first step to murder. How does this apply to the question of global warming? Just this: if I believe that global warming might be happening, then if I don’t do what I can to stop it, I am guilty of intentionally causing it. It is what happens in my mind that determines my responsibility.
Taken together, I must do what I can to make a difference. So, have we installed our PV panels because we have fallen prey to the global warming conspiracy? I guess in a sense we have. My position as a steward of God’s creation along with my responsibility for my intentions means that I have no other choice. Besides, they look cool!
Pastor Ken
First, let me say that I completely understand those who have doubts about the subject. I am old enough to remember when we were being told in the 1970s that we were in the middle of a “global cooling” that threatened to bring on another Ice Age. And, the question of global warming has been used as a political tool by both parties in our country, as well as being a sort of “orthodoxy” that many feel they can disagree with only at their peril. None of this affects whether or not global warming is a reality, but it certainly makes it hard for those not in the scientific community to know. So what are we to do? Is there a “Christian” response to all of this? I believe there is.
I believe that our response to this possible crisis can be informed by two scriptural principles. The first is that, in Genesis chapters 1-3 we are told that God has made humanity “stewards” of this creation. And, as the Bible says, Stewards are to be “found faithful” above all else (1 Corinthians 4:2). In other words, when someone is entrusted with something that belongs to someone else, they have a responsibility to do their very best to make sure that it stays in good shape. And, whether you believe in global warming or not, no one can deny that we have done a pretty poor job of keeping our environment clean. This world is not ours! It is God’s. And we are responsible to Him for how we use and treat it. So, the first reason I am so firmly committed to taking good care of this creation is because I am a steward appointed by God to do so, at least the part I have any control over.
The second principle comes from the teaching of Jesus that it is not even what we do that determines our responsibility, but our state of mind. You may remember that Jesus said that even looking at someone with lust is the first step to adultery and just hating someone is the first step to murder. How does this apply to the question of global warming? Just this: if I believe that global warming might be happening, then if I don’t do what I can to stop it, I am guilty of intentionally causing it. It is what happens in my mind that determines my responsibility.
Taken together, I must do what I can to make a difference. So, have we installed our PV panels because we have fallen prey to the global warming conspiracy? I guess in a sense we have. My position as a steward of God’s creation along with my responsibility for my intentions means that I have no other choice. Besides, they look cool!
Pastor Ken
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Easy or Good?
As I sit at my desk writing this blog, the jackhammers are going outside for the final phase for installing the Solar Electric system here at West Valley Christian Center, the Three Crosses Church. It represents the culmination of a long term project to “go green,” minimizing our carbon footprint. We are excited about the fact that we will be “coming on line” in a matter of days.
One thing that has impressed me greatly in the process has been the way that the foreman has handled the project. We have had a number of building projects around the church here, and I oversaw the construction of a new church at my last pastorate, and I have never seen anyone so committed to getting the details right. He has made sure that everything is done properly.
This got me thinking that one of the gifts that we give back to God is our worship in our work. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “If a man is called to be a streetsweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the host of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great streetsweeper who did his job well.” How refreshing it is to see someone who actually lives that way. It has been a powerful reminder to me to do the same. Have a great day!
Pastor Ken
One thing that has impressed me greatly in the process has been the way that the foreman has handled the project. We have had a number of building projects around the church here, and I oversaw the construction of a new church at my last pastorate, and I have never seen anyone so committed to getting the details right. He has made sure that everything is done properly.
This got me thinking that one of the gifts that we give back to God is our worship in our work. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “If a man is called to be a streetsweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the host of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great streetsweeper who did his job well.” How refreshing it is to see someone who actually lives that way. It has been a powerful reminder to me to do the same. Have a great day!
Pastor Ken
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Today or Tomorrow?
Christianity has been accused from time to time of being a “pie in the sky in the sweet bye and bye” religion. Or as others have put it, “so heavenly minded that it is no earthly good.” The focus on heaven and eternity is understandable from one perspective. After all, if we are really eternal creatures, then this life is but a blip on the radar screen. In fact, one could argue that the only important purpose in this life would be to secure the best position for eternity, and nothing else would matter. And yet….
And yet, this life is the only one we actually know about by experience. Yes, I know that there is a place for faith. But this is still the only life we know anything about in our personal experience. And that makes it a valid question to ask if preparing for the next life means we give up something in this life.
Of course, the answer to that question is:”Yes!” But that doesn’t really tell us anything, does it? I mean, every decision we make to do something entails not doing something else. The real question is, will we be less happy or fulfilled in this life if we focus on the life to come. And I am confident in answering that question, “No!”
This blog is not the place to go into detail on what we gain and what we lose to live for God and the life to come. That is a subject for a life of study. But I can say that, after having been a Christian for 37 years, I am confident that my life has been happier than I ever expected, and that the main reason is that I have chosen to do what God has said in the Bible. I have no hesitation in recommending the lifestyle outlined in the Bible to any and everyone. It leads to a life that not only avoids many of the major pitfalls of life, but has a positive effect for happiness. And if you aren’t sure that is true, well then call me at my office any time and I would love to talk to you about it.
But there is one more thing. In addition to real joy and happiness in this life, I also have the assurance that my life has eternal consequences. Oh yeah, and I get to be with God forever, too. Not a bad deal!
Pastor Ken
And yet, this life is the only one we actually know about by experience. Yes, I know that there is a place for faith. But this is still the only life we know anything about in our personal experience. And that makes it a valid question to ask if preparing for the next life means we give up something in this life.
Of course, the answer to that question is:”Yes!” But that doesn’t really tell us anything, does it? I mean, every decision we make to do something entails not doing something else. The real question is, will we be less happy or fulfilled in this life if we focus on the life to come. And I am confident in answering that question, “No!”
This blog is not the place to go into detail on what we gain and what we lose to live for God and the life to come. That is a subject for a life of study. But I can say that, after having been a Christian for 37 years, I am confident that my life has been happier than I ever expected, and that the main reason is that I have chosen to do what God has said in the Bible. I have no hesitation in recommending the lifestyle outlined in the Bible to any and everyone. It leads to a life that not only avoids many of the major pitfalls of life, but has a positive effect for happiness. And if you aren’t sure that is true, well then call me at my office any time and I would love to talk to you about it.
But there is one more thing. In addition to real joy and happiness in this life, I also have the assurance that my life has eternal consequences. Oh yeah, and I get to be with God forever, too. Not a bad deal!
Pastor Ken
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Going Green
This coming Tuesday Advanced Solar Electric will begin the installation of West Valley Christian Center’s new solar generating system. When complete, it will consist of around 150 solar panels generating just over 36 Kilowatts of electricity a day. This should be sufficient to provide about 80% of our electrical needs, thus reducing our carbon footprint by a like amount. And, since that electricity will be generated during the highest usage portion of the day, actually producing a surplus during that time, it will help to put off or even make unnecessary additional generating capacity using methods which pollute.
Why are we doing this? There are actually a couple of reasons, but the most important is that it allows our church to do something tangible to be good stewards of this planet our God has given us. We take seriously our responsibility before God and our fellow humans to begin reversing the damage we have done to our home.
In the coming months and years we intend on exploring other ways to lessen our negative impact on this world. I remember as a Boy Scout the admonition we always received when we were preparing to leave our campsites: leave it in better condition than you found it when you came. We want to do the same for this planet.
Pastor Ken
Why are we doing this? There are actually a couple of reasons, but the most important is that it allows our church to do something tangible to be good stewards of this planet our God has given us. We take seriously our responsibility before God and our fellow humans to begin reversing the damage we have done to our home.
In the coming months and years we intend on exploring other ways to lessen our negative impact on this world. I remember as a Boy Scout the admonition we always received when we were preparing to leave our campsites: leave it in better condition than you found it when you came. We want to do the same for this planet.
Pastor Ken
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Can't we all just get along?
So this past week a new movie was released – Expelled, a documentary by Ben Stein. And the response has been interesting to watch, and instructive as well.
The heart of Mr. Stein’s documentary is the recent tendency in some circles to discriminate against people in the scientific community who entertain the idea of Intelligent Design (ID). Intelligent Design is the suggestion that there are things in this universe that point to an intelligent designer rather than blind Darwinian evolution. In the movie, Mr. Stein points to several scientists who have either lost their jobs or their funding immediately after suggesting that more research into the possibility of ID having occurred.
I do not necessarily agree with the tack that the movie takes in making its case – the juxtapositions between people who disagree with ID and pictures of Hitler or Stalin remind me more of Michael Moore than Ken Burns. But, when the movie is done, Mr. Stein has done a pretty good job of showing that there does seem to be an attempt to silence those who are even willing to entertain the possibility of ID, at least in some circles.
But perhaps the most interesting response to this movie was the review posted on MSNBC.com (read it at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24239755/). In spite of the fact that the movie deals with ID and not creationism, the very first paragraph sets the movie up as defending creationism! And, in a display of the very intolerance decried by liberals today, the reviewer proceeds to call both the movie and Mr. Stein, “stupid,” a word sure to inspire intelligent discussion of the topic!
I, for one, would like to suggest that we would all be better served by a discussion of the facts rather than calling each other names. And that goes for both sides – I have been even more appalled by the name calling that has come from some in the church; after all, we should know better. There is a discussion to be had here, and in many other areas of what some have called the “culture wars.” Wouldn’t it be nice if we could actually discuss it as rational adults? Or, as has been said by many others, can’t we “disagree without being disagreeable?” Just a thought.
The heart of Mr. Stein’s documentary is the recent tendency in some circles to discriminate against people in the scientific community who entertain the idea of Intelligent Design (ID). Intelligent Design is the suggestion that there are things in this universe that point to an intelligent designer rather than blind Darwinian evolution. In the movie, Mr. Stein points to several scientists who have either lost their jobs or their funding immediately after suggesting that more research into the possibility of ID having occurred.
I do not necessarily agree with the tack that the movie takes in making its case – the juxtapositions between people who disagree with ID and pictures of Hitler or Stalin remind me more of Michael Moore than Ken Burns. But, when the movie is done, Mr. Stein has done a pretty good job of showing that there does seem to be an attempt to silence those who are even willing to entertain the possibility of ID, at least in some circles.
But perhaps the most interesting response to this movie was the review posted on MSNBC.com (read it at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24239755/). In spite of the fact that the movie deals with ID and not creationism, the very first paragraph sets the movie up as defending creationism! And, in a display of the very intolerance decried by liberals today, the reviewer proceeds to call both the movie and Mr. Stein, “stupid,” a word sure to inspire intelligent discussion of the topic!
I, for one, would like to suggest that we would all be better served by a discussion of the facts rather than calling each other names. And that goes for both sides – I have been even more appalled by the name calling that has come from some in the church; after all, we should know better. There is a discussion to be had here, and in many other areas of what some have called the “culture wars.” Wouldn’t it be nice if we could actually discuss it as rational adults? Or, as has been said by many others, can’t we “disagree without being disagreeable?” Just a thought.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
The Right to be Free
Freedom. Pro-Choice. Equal rights.
These are the terms our society embraces. Clearly we have freedom living in a democratic-republic. Still, freedom comes with responsibility and exceptions. One might say that person has free speech, but that freedom ceases when it jeopardizes the safety and well being of others in the pursuit of their own rights. For example, when someone exercises their free speech in a crowded theater by yelling fire when there is no fire; at that point, the person is criminally responsible for the panic and injuries resulting from the stampede.
Our freedoms do have limitations. I often wonder why abortion isn’t treated the same way as the illustration above. It is already considered—legally—double-homicide when an unborn baby is killed as a result of murder against the pregnant mother, and most scientists acknowledge the humanity of the unborn, despite arguments of viability, cognition, and such. It would seem that we have a moral double standard here. Hmmm!
My point in this blog is actually not to argue against abortion, or any other issue I might bring up, based on a legal or constitutional platform. Rather, I want to beg a rather important question: Are some of the freedoms our culture espouses to actually right? Regardless of having these freedoms (real or perceived), are they correct?
With all the rhetoric of freedom and equality and tolerance out there right now, the practitioners of what might be seen as morally questionable behavior by Christianity and other faiths or worldviews, seem to be preoccupied with the securing a place at the table over and above considering if such views are actually moral.
In a postmodern and often relativistic society, moral correctness has become an individual choice, subject only to the whims and notions of a person’s worldview, regardless of how that worldview is informed. I suspect that much of this subjectivism is fed by hedonism: Does it feel right or good?
Ah! Feelings… Perhaps emotion plays a bigger role in the issue than anything else. For example, homosexuality is a hot button issue. There are some who claim a bio-chemical cause to homosexuality, and maybe there is. It still doesn’t answer whether it’s right or not. The claimants might argue that it feels fight, or that they’ve always felt different & attracted to the opposite sex; therefore, it must by natural or as God designed it. This reasoning is based mostly on emotion and not on Scripture (though there are those who attempt to translate Scripture to support their views on homosexuality and other sins) or science.
So, we have a culture that promotes freedom based on emotional decision making and not the deeper truths of correctness. What would happen if people’s questioning and investigations led them to ask not what feels good, sounds good, or makes sense subjectively, and started asking “what is right?”.
Now, I must confess that my goal is not to target the big ticket sins that many Christians often do, like homosexuality and abortion, but these are perhaps the two biggest and best examples for my point. Rather, my goal is declare that the question of moral correctness is also relevant to each one of us on a personal scale as well. Look at me for example… I love food and am made fat for it. I am a confessed glutton. I have abused a good and natural gift of God and an essential freedom. I am just as culpable for my sin as anyone else, despite the media notoriety.
Sin is rooted in pride and self-autonomy to begin with, so it’s actually not surprising that people would substantiate their sins by leaning on emotion, feelings, or limited information. My goal is not to target the well known or the little sins of any one person or group. Rather, I simply hope to encourage everyone to consider not the freedom you have to do or choose things, but whether those things are objectively right, regardless of what it is. Blessings.
-Pastor Paddy
These are the terms our society embraces. Clearly we have freedom living in a democratic-republic. Still, freedom comes with responsibility and exceptions. One might say that person has free speech, but that freedom ceases when it jeopardizes the safety and well being of others in the pursuit of their own rights. For example, when someone exercises their free speech in a crowded theater by yelling fire when there is no fire; at that point, the person is criminally responsible for the panic and injuries resulting from the stampede.
Our freedoms do have limitations. I often wonder why abortion isn’t treated the same way as the illustration above. It is already considered—legally—double-homicide when an unborn baby is killed as a result of murder against the pregnant mother, and most scientists acknowledge the humanity of the unborn, despite arguments of viability, cognition, and such. It would seem that we have a moral double standard here. Hmmm!
My point in this blog is actually not to argue against abortion, or any other issue I might bring up, based on a legal or constitutional platform. Rather, I want to beg a rather important question: Are some of the freedoms our culture espouses to actually right? Regardless of having these freedoms (real or perceived), are they correct?
With all the rhetoric of freedom and equality and tolerance out there right now, the practitioners of what might be seen as morally questionable behavior by Christianity and other faiths or worldviews, seem to be preoccupied with the securing a place at the table over and above considering if such views are actually moral.
In a postmodern and often relativistic society, moral correctness has become an individual choice, subject only to the whims and notions of a person’s worldview, regardless of how that worldview is informed. I suspect that much of this subjectivism is fed by hedonism: Does it feel right or good?
Ah! Feelings… Perhaps emotion plays a bigger role in the issue than anything else. For example, homosexuality is a hot button issue. There are some who claim a bio-chemical cause to homosexuality, and maybe there is. It still doesn’t answer whether it’s right or not. The claimants might argue that it feels fight, or that they’ve always felt different & attracted to the opposite sex; therefore, it must by natural or as God designed it. This reasoning is based mostly on emotion and not on Scripture (though there are those who attempt to translate Scripture to support their views on homosexuality and other sins) or science.
So, we have a culture that promotes freedom based on emotional decision making and not the deeper truths of correctness. What would happen if people’s questioning and investigations led them to ask not what feels good, sounds good, or makes sense subjectively, and started asking “what is right?”.
Now, I must confess that my goal is not to target the big ticket sins that many Christians often do, like homosexuality and abortion, but these are perhaps the two biggest and best examples for my point. Rather, my goal is declare that the question of moral correctness is also relevant to each one of us on a personal scale as well. Look at me for example… I love food and am made fat for it. I am a confessed glutton. I have abused a good and natural gift of God and an essential freedom. I am just as culpable for my sin as anyone else, despite the media notoriety.
Sin is rooted in pride and self-autonomy to begin with, so it’s actually not surprising that people would substantiate their sins by leaning on emotion, feelings, or limited information. My goal is not to target the well known or the little sins of any one person or group. Rather, I simply hope to encourage everyone to consider not the freedom you have to do or choose things, but whether those things are objectively right, regardless of what it is. Blessings.
-Pastor Paddy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
